Research

ISO/IEC 27001 vs SOC 2 vs ISO/IEC 42001: What AI Companies Actually Need (and Why)

January 26, 2026
ISO/IEC 27001 vs SOC 2 vs ISO/IEC 42001: What AI Companies Actually Need (and Why)

If you’re building an AI product—especially one that touches customer data, hiring, finance, healthcare, or enterprise workflows—you will eventually get one (or more) of these questions:

  • “Do you have a SOC 2?”
  • “Are you ISO/IEC 27001 certified?”
  • “What are you doing about AI governance and responsible AI?”

Increasingly, enterprise buyers, regulators, and partners are no longer satisfied with just security. They want proof that your company also manages data security, privacy, AI risk, ethics, and operational impact.

That’s where SOC 2, ISO/IEC 27001, and ISO/IEC 42001 come in.

They are not competitors. They solve different parts of the trust problem.

The Simple Mental Model

Think of them like this:

  • SOC 2 → “Can we trust your operations?”
  • ISO/IEC 27001 → “Can we trust your security management system?”
  • ISO/IEC 42001 → “Can we trust your AI?”

Note:  ISO/IEC 27001 covers 80-90% of SOC 2 controls. While most customers accept either standard as evidence of strong security governance, some enterprises do treat them as different trust artifacts. ISO/IEC 42001, on the other hand, are AI-risk focused.

Key Differences at a Glance

Features ISO/IEC 27001 SOC 2 (Type II) ISO/IEC 42001
Focus Information Security (ISMS) Data Security Privacy AI Governance (AIMS)
Primary Goal Protect data assets Build security trust Build Responsible AI trust
Scope Technical/Physical Controls Trust Services Criteria AI Lifecycle/Transparency
Market Global North America Emerging Global Standard
Best For Baseline Security SaaS/Enterprise Clients AI-specific Risk Management

What They Have in Common

All three standards:

  • Are used to build trust with enterprise customers
  • Require formal policies, procedures, and controls
  • Are risk-based, not checkbox exercises
  • Require evidence, not just promises
  • Involve independent auditors or certification bodies
  • Force operational maturity across engineering, security, legal, and leadership

Where They Are Fundamentally Different

1. Scope: What Risk They Actually Cover

SOC 2

SOC 2 stands for System and Organization Controls 2, a framework developed by the AICPA (American Institute of Certified Public Accountants) to help service organizations manage and protect customer data, ensuring it's handled securely according to five core Trust Services Criteria (TSC):

  • Security (always required)
  • Availability
  • Confidentiality
  • Processing integrity
  • Privacy

SOC 2 answers: “Are your systems and processes secure and reliable?”

ISO/IEC 27001

ISO 27001 is the globally recognized standard for establishing, implementing, maintaining, and continuously improving an Information Security Management System (ISMS), a systematic approach to managing sensitive company information to keep it secure with focus on:

  • Governance
  • Risk management
  • Policies
  • Asset management
  • Access control
  • Incident management
  • Supplier security
  • Business continuity

ISO/IEC 27001 answers: “Do you run a mature, auditable security management program?”

ISO/IEC 42001

ISO/IEC 42001 is the first international standard for establishing an Artificial Intelligence Management System (AIMS), providing a framework for organizations to responsibly design, develop, deploy, and use AI systems, with focus on AI-specific risks, including:

  • Bias and fairness
  • Safety and reliability
  • Transparency and explainability
  • Human oversight
  • Data governance
  • Model lifecycle management
  • Monitoring, drift, and misuse
  • Legal, ethical, and societal impacts

ISO/IEC 42001 answers: “Do you systematically govern how AI is designed, deployed, monitored, and controlled?”

2. Geography and Market Signaling

SOC 2

  • De facto standard in North America
  • Especially important for US enterprise SaaS buyers

ISO/IEC 27001

  • Globally recognized
  • Strong signal in Europe, APAC, and regulated industries

ISO/IEC 42001

  • Emerging global standard for AI governance
  • Increasingly relevant for: Regulated AI (HR, finance, healthcare, insurance); Companies selling into US, EU, UK, or regulated enterprises; Buyers worried about AI risk, not just data security

3. What do you get at the End

SOC 2 Type 2

  • You get a detailed auditor report
  • You will have to do the audit every year

ISO/IEC 27001

  • You get a certification after stage 1 and stage 2 audit
  • You will have to do survellience year 1 and year 2 audit to maintain certificate

ISO/IEC 42001

  • You get a certification after stage 1 and stage 2 audit
  • You will have to do survellience year 1 and year 2 audit to maintain certificate

The Big Misconception for AI Companies

“If we have SOC 2 or ISO/IEC 27001, we’re covered.”

You’re covered for security.

You are not covered for:

  • Bias risk
  • Model failure risk
  • Hallucination risk
  • Unsafe use cases
  • Regulatory AI compliance
  • Explainability and oversight
  • AI-specific incident management

That’s exactly the gap ISO/IEC 42001 is designed to fill.

Which One Should an AI Company Get?

Ask yourself:

1. Who are your customers?

  • US enterprises → You’ll almost certainly need SOC 2
  • Global enterprises → You’ll almost certainly need ISO/IEC 27001
  • Regulated or risk-sensitive buyers → You’ll increasingly be asked about AI governance

2. Do you build or deploy AI systems that impact people, decisions, or risk?

If yes:

  • You will need AI governance, not just security
  • That means ISO/IEC 42001, sooner or later

3. Do you want to sell “trust” as a product feature?

Then:

  • SOC 2 proves operational trust
  • ISO/IEC 27001 proves security governance maturity
  • ISO/IEC 42001 proves responsible AI maturity

Do AI Companies Need All Three?

Increasingly: yes.

They cover three different risk layers:

Together, they form a complete enterprise trust stack for AI companies.

The Strategic Advantage

Most AI companies today:

  • Have SOC 2 or are working on it
  • Some have ISO/IEC 27001
  • Almost none have credible, auditable AI governance

That means: ISO/IEC 42001 is about to become a major differentiator—just like SOC 2 was for SaaS 10 years ago.

The Bottom Line

  • SOC 2 proves you run a trustworthy service
  • ISO/IEC 27001 proves you run a mature security management system
  • ISO/IEC 42001 proves you run AI responsibly

If you’re an AI company selling into serious enterprises, regulated industries, or global markets, security alone is no longer enough.

The future standard enterprise question will be: “Yes, but how do you govern your AI?”

You may be interested in

Want to get started with safe & compliant AI adoption?

Schedule a call with one of our experts to see how Fairly AI can help
Layer Standard Operational trust SOC 2 Security governance ISO/IEC 27001 AI governance & responsible AI ISO/IEC 42001